Opinion: Opposing the C-1 Alignment, Favoring South and Westerly Alignment

This letter is from David Stringfellow a farmingtoncitizens.org subcriber and is in response to the resent post advocating the C-1 alighment. David opposes the C-1 alignment and favors the existing south and westerly alignment as indicated in the Farmington City Master Transporation plan. Any other thoughtful opinions on the West Davis Corridor alignments are welcomed and may be posted.

 

Farmington Citizens,

Many have advocated recently for a C-1 West Davis Corridor option. It is proposed that we can efficiently join 4 major transportation hubs in a very small area. Some readers may have experience driving in other states or countries, those places I have driven that attempt this kind of 'flexibility' often end up in traffic jams for hours. I think transportation engineers should be a bit more humble and recognize the physical limitation some spaces impose.

Most Farmington residents will not be using whatever highway ends up being built on the West Davis Corridor. This road will primarily be a way of getting future west-side commuters of northern Davis, Weber, and Ogden Counties to and from Salt Lake County.  I believe the highway should be as initially envisaged, a complete west side highway stretching from Ogden to Salt Lake City.  This corridor should link to the now existing Legacy Highway, and only the Legacy Highway. This will keep most commuters on the west side transportation route until they get to Salt Lake County, instead of having them flood the very same routes we are trying to access. By connecting only with the Legacy Highway; it will help ensure that the capacity on Legacy Highway is actually used and leave the rest of us with a more efficient (ie, less crowded) route to transport ourselves south.

Some have raised objections that a western alignment would damage the environment. While some areas may be unavoidably impacted, the same is true in cutting across the E-1 designated corridor as wetlands are also present through this corridor. Additionally, it is my belief that a western most alignment would demarcate an impassable barrier beyond which future development could not encroach. Without a western aligned road, the pressures of development accompanying a doubling of the population along the Wasatch Front would slowly and persistently encroach on the wetlands. By adopting a western alignment that is sensitive to wetlands, while avoiding existing housing communities to the greatest degree possible, the physical boundaries of Farmington will be unalterably set. Over the next 50 years, we would work together to shape and fully build out the great city I've called home for over 20 years.

Unfortunately, whatever alignment is adopted will impact some homes.  Whether it be a handful of homes near Glovers Lane, the unfortunate loss of the Buffalo Ranch, or plowing through two neighborhoods straddling the Kaysville/Farmington border, some homes will be lost.  We can imagine that in a world without resource constraints, our government may be persuaded to tunnel under neighborhoods or build elevated highways.  As far as dreams go, maybe we could ask them to build the highway on Antelope Island instead.  But we live in a world with resource constraints; false hope among our community in which everyone's home is unscathed borders on delusion when confronted with the current facts.  Our community has a difficult and uncomfortable decision to make. Our city leaders have lead the way in making this decision by in reviewing the evidence, the facts, the transportation models, and available alternatives. A cursory look at the map will reveal why Farmington City altered the Master Transportation Plan to prefer a western/southern boundary preference for the West Davis Corridor. If the decision is between putting the corridor between 2 beautifully planned, dense neighborhoods among 235 homes, flanked by 2 LDS churches OR placing it as far to the west and south as possible while minimizing the number of impacted homes; which course would you choose?

I support Farmington's decision because it is what is best for the city. It is the best option for most of it's residents. The decision underwent months of hearings, study, a lot of expense in hiring a professional transportation planner, and our own communities input. I encourage the support of the western/southern alignment for the West Davis Corridor and would encourage all to express this same opinion to UDOT.

boldly,
David Stringfellow

Join the Bandwagon: C-1 Alternative Modified

Hopefully each of you were able to attend the UDOT open house last Thursday (Aug 5). If you haven't taken the chance to tell UDOT your thoughts on the alternatives please do so online before August 24th. If you still haven't seen the large maps then you are in luck as UDOT has a booth at the Davis County Fair August 18-21.

Besides getting you to comment on the UDOT alternatives this message has another motive. A Farmington resident has done some fine work on modifying UDOT's C-1 alternative.  Because of his professional experience his maps should be taken very seriously. This resident's work makes the argument that a D&RGW alignment (B-1) and a westerly alignment (A-1) are not needed as a I-15 parallel alignment (C-1) can be accomplished.

When you have a few minutes download the maps of the C-1 Alternative Modified proposal here: PDF file (this is a large 17MB file that will take some time to download). A snapshot of the C-1 Alternative Modified proposal can be found on this page: http://farmingtoncitizens.org/web/c_1-modifications. Take some time to digest it and include your support for the C-1 Alternative Modified in your comments to UDOT.

I-15 Alignment Just Might Work: C-1 Modifications

A Farmington resident has provided valuable input regarding the West Davis Corridor alignments through Farmington. He has taken what is the C-1 alignment from UDOT's potential alternatives and made modifications to show where the road will be located. The maps are in the PDF document linked below (17MB large file size warning). Because of his professional experience these maps should be taken very seriously. He shows that a roughly parallel I-15 alignment through Farmington just might work. With this proposal there is no need to split Farmington with a D&RGW alignment or disturb the environment with a westerly alignment. Making this proposal work would be a blessing to many stakeholders including residents, environmentalists, and commercial interests.
 
Preview of C1 Modifications 
 
Don't be scared of the large PDF file but just be aware it might take some time to download (17MB in size).

Lines on Paper - Where Do You Want the Road to Go?

UDOT is now to the third phase (Alternatives Development & Screening) of the EIS for the West Davis Corridor. This means that there are now lines drawn on a map for where this controversial road will go. This new iteration is something new. So now the public, you, has one month to raise pitch forks and torches and express opinions on where the road should go. Comments should be submitted by August 30 online or email: westdavis@utah.gov.

If you want to see some large versions of the maps and to yell at someone (just kidding, UDOT) you should attend one of the open houses this week. For us Farmington folks be at the fair grounds this Thursday August 5th between 4:30PM and 8:00PM.

Next Phase in UDOT's EIS: Purpose and Need

Update: Link to Deseret News article added (5/14/2010)

UDOT Published on Friday (May 7, 2010) its draft Purpose and Need document. To summarize UDOT want to "improve mobility" in west Davis and Weber. All options are still on the table (roads and transit) at this point. One of those options is the continuation of Legacy to the north. Now until June 7th is a new phase for public comment. 

Summary:
http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/files/WDC_Get_Involved%20page_DRAFT_Purpose_and_Need_Summary.pdf

Full Content:
http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/files/WDC_Get_Involved_page_DRAFT_Purpose_and_Need_Full_Content.pdf

UDOT is accepting comments on the draft purpose and need until June 7th. Please go to UDOT's website to comment:
http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/get_involved

Media articles and commentary:
http://www.standard.net/topics/opinion/2010/05/12/our-view-legacy-extension-needed
http://www.standard.net/topics/construction/2010/05/11/udot-proposes-corridor-ease-transportation-issues

http://www.standard.net/topics/udot/2010/05/07/udot-says-legacy-extension-needed
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700032244/UDOT-study-Without-help-Davis-and-Weber-will-suffer-from-congestion.html

Special Farmington Council Meeting

Mar 17 2010 - 7:00pm
Mar 17 2010 - 8:30pm
US/Mountain

Farmington City Council will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, March 17, 2010, from 7:00 - 8:30 p.m. at the CenterCal Properties office located at:

42 North 650 West
Farmington, UT

The regularly scheduled “Town Hall” Meeting is being noticed as a “Special Meeting” in order to allow all Farmington City Council Members to attend if they wish to do so. Discussion regarding the Station Park Project (CenterCal Properties) and the Park Lane Village Project (The HAWS Companies) will take place. Both projects are planned for the west Farmington area.

You Have 6 Days Left to Comment - West Davis EIS

If you haven't done so already please go to UDOT's website and comment on the West Davis EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). Here is the link for the comment form:

http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/get_involved#contact

You can email them as well:

westdavis@utah.gov

Please comment as soon as possible as the commenting period ends March 22nd. This means that comments submitted after March 22nd will not be included as part of the scoping phase. Folks, this is a numbers game with UDOT. In a sence you are voting to let these bureaucrats know that a road through the heart of west Farmington is unacceptable. Go comment!

UDOT Open House - Feb 24

Mark your calendars to attend 6 days from now a UDOT kickoff open house meeting for the West Davis Corridor Environmental Study. One of three public meetings will be held on Wednesday February 24, 2010 at the Legacy Events Center (Fairgrounds at 151 South 1100 West, Farmington) from 4:30PM to 8:00PM. Here is more information about the meeting open house:

http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pg:3728889201635947:::1:T,V:1702

So why is attending this open house so important? Well in short, knowledge is power. The more Farmington citizens know about what UDOT is up to in our neighborhoods the more power well have to help them get it right.

UDOT will be conducting an EIS (environmental impact study) on building more roads through Farmington and the rest of Davis County. This EIS will be the magic UDOT will use to justify whether or not a freeway gets built right through the heart of west Farmington. Farmington City has told UDOT via its Master Transporation Plan where it wants a road to go (out west along the lake shore). Farmington citizens have been telling UDOT for many years that the Legacy Connector should not bisect west Farmington. Now is another good time to make sure UDOT knows what is best for west Farmington. The EIS requires public input, so give your input. Go to the meeting. Here is more information about the EIS:

http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/

Once you've done your homework then go and let UDOT know what you think is best for Famington by commenting here:

http://www.udot.utah.gov/westdavis/pages/get_involved#contact

2009 General Election Results

Congratulations to Jim Talbot and John Bilton for winning the 2009 Farmington City Council General Election. Here are the election results results:

Mayor:
Scott Harbertson - 1,154

City Council (2 seats):
Jim Talbot - 1,379
John S. Bilton - 1,194
Anita Todd - 868
D. Kevin Poff - 664

Bond Election:
FOR - 8709 (60.86%)
AGAINST - 5602 (39.14%)

 

Deseret News Article
Davis County Clerk

2009 Primary Election Results

Primary Election results for Farmington City Council. The top four move on to the General Election contest in November. (Source Deseret News)

x-Jim Talbot, 804

x-John S. Bilton, 778

x- Anita Todd, 420

x-D. Kevin Poff, 217

Carson Howell, 189 

Nelsen Michaelson, 184

Preston Child, 118

David Eric Hale 80

Justin LeCheminant, 44

Syndicate content