Letter to Mayor - Politics at the Fire Department?

Update: See the Mayor's reply to this letter here: Mayor's Reply - Politics at the Fire Department?

 

Dear Mayor,

It came to my attention today that Chief Larry Gregory spent the first part of drill time telling those in attendance how to vote in the City Council elections. He said that the west side candidates only had one agenda and that was to stop the option 3 UDOT proposal and that they didn't understand any of the real issues of the city. Fortunately I wasn't at the drill last night or I would have turned in my pager and quit on the spot. As a tax paying citizen of Farmington I don't think Fire Drill time (for which the City is paying) should be used as a political campaigning arena unless all of the candidates are invited and given time to tell their views and answer questions. I know that Chief Gregory doesn't have any idea as to how the "west side" candidates view all of the issues facing Farmington. It disturbs me, not that he has an opinion about the candidates, but that he is telling the firemen how to vote by dispensing inaccurate information about the west side candidates. I don't believe that campaigning for candidates on City time is in his job description. I really don't care who he supports, I just think he handled this so poorly that he should at least apologize to the Fire Department, the candidates, and the citizens of Farmington. If campaigning should be done at drill shouldn't the candidates be invited to represent themselves rather than having the Chief tell everyone what they do or don't support?

You have been to our committee meetings and know how strongly we feel about the UDOT issue, but you also saw that we from the west side are interested in Farmington as a whole. We are not promoting an East versus West or any other platform which divides the city. Physically dividing the city with a freeway is not what we want, but creating an "us versus them" division is even worse than dividing us with a freeway and I know that the three candidates from the west side feel the same way. They all want "Farmington First"--that's the whole city, not just the west side.

Since the Chief took it upon himself to spend taxpayers money to campaign for the status quo, I think it only fair that he invite all of the candidates to drill and let the city pay for the audience to be there so everyone's views can be given. The Chief was way out of line using my money for that purpose and what it looks like is that he was told to go and tell the firemen how they should vote. This only continues to give the appearance of back door politics. And if that is the case then we really have a problem at City Hall.

He also said that the City Council was going to meet with UDOT next week and refuse their request for Option 3. I hope that is true, but I fail to see the urgency for the vote at this time.

I would like to hear from you concerning this matter.

Thanks,

Dave Kershisnik

East vs. West?

Dave--

I share your concern that Chief Gregory, or any city-employed manager, would take city time to electioneer, let alone tell subordinates how they should vote. I believe he deserves a reprimand, and it would probably be appropriate for a memo to be sent to all employees.

I also agree with your other point, that it doesn't serve our city well to promote a West vs. East, or "us vs. them" mentality. You complain about Chief Gregory promoting that, but isn't that what this whole website is about? The top item on the main page is headlined "Candidates for City Council", and includes pictures and information for three, not six, candidates. Those candidates all hail from the west side of the city. Is that not a divisive approach?

Prior to the last four months, I had never heard anyone in the city, citizen or official, say anything that indicated an east vs. west mentality. Whether they want to admit it or not, the citizens of the west side of Farmington have promoted that idea in order to gain political power. Political power is not a bad thing, as long as it's not abused, but let's call a spade a spade. There was an issue that needed addressing with UDOT, and even WITH political power, fighting UDOT can be an ominous task (ask those who fought the 114th South interchange in SL Co--individuals spent hundreds of thousands of their own money in legal fees, and had to go to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver not once, but twice).

The UDOT/Legacy corridor issue isn't going away anytime soon. West side residents aren't the only ones being impacted by the alternatives being considered, and it would behoove all of us to work together to find the best corridor plan for ALL involved, then use the collective might of ALL Farmington residents to ensure UDOT doesn't run over us roughshod.

The first step may be for the "Farmington Citizens" website (and sponsoring organization), to take a step back from all the polarizing rhetoric, and include, rather than excluding, all Farmington residents. Post the pictures and bios of all six candidates, regardless of where they live. A long-overdue second step is to revise Farmington code to elect City Council members by region in the city, ensuring that every geography is equally represented. If not, those on the "west" side will find their political clout is short-lived when residents in the north, east, and south parts of the city rally their superior numbers out to the voting booth. It may not be wise for candidates to continue to identify themselves as "west-side" candidates in that type of scenario.

Here's for a quick end to this divisiveness before it gets out of hand and destroys what is a great city!

Lowell N. Steele